PLUS ONE NEWS CENTRE: INDIGENOUS GROUP IN CANADA - With Associates On Both Sides Of The 49Th // - Have Declared Strategy To Void the CHINA BELT & ROAD CANADA TREATY

JAN 11TH SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST 2020 A.D.E.

Paramountcy Voids Canada 2014 Belt & Road Treaty With China

RESPECTFULLY PUBLISHED BY : RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN : SIPO PLUS ONE NEWS CENTRAL OPIS

Citing Numerous Court Decisions Allegedly In Their Favour, GTIF Indigenous Leaders Speakers (Sqwi’qwals) Have Issued Political Papers Drawing Attention To International Law And Custom Law Doctrines That Purport To The Continued Paramount Governing Authority Of Indigenous Peoples To Determine The Parties To Trade Treaties.

Therein, These Leaders Detail Their Mission In Canada To Take These Issues To Three International Tribunals To Receive Verification By Judicial Decision That Crown Canada Was – And, Remains – Without Empowerment To Enter Into Trade Agreements With Alien Parties Without The Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) Of Indigenous Peoples.

Indigenous Peoples Have Continuously Rejected The Crown Canada – China FIPA (Foreign Investment Parties Agreement) That The Harper Administration Entered Into In 2014.

The Central Argument Of The GTIF (UN Registered In 2013 As An IGO / SPO) Is Described As Focusing Upon The Principal Duty Of The Canada Crown To Comply With The Two Row Wampum Covenant (TRWC) – Wherein, Indigenous Canoes Permit Crown Canada Ships To Ply “Canadian” Waters.

The TRWC Distinguishes That The Indigenous Peoples Possess The Ultimate Veto Authority (Via Clan Mothers) To Require The Ship To Weigh Anchor And Depart Indigenous Waters And Shorelines Where There Arises Actions That Are An Affront To The Sovereign Paramount Indigenous Governing Authority.

GTIF & Associates Contend That The 2014 FIPA Breaches In Kind And Substance The TRW Covenant; Depriving Indigenous Peoples Of Specific Land Rights. Chief Deskaheh Contended Such Points In 1923, Seeking The League Of Nations Audience; Being Rebuffed - But, Speaking To 10,000 People At A Public Forum.

The Three Principal International Tribunals That The GTIF Legal Counsel Will Petition Will Be (A) The UN Security Council On Two Points (i) Alleged Void Crown Canada Membership Through The Credentials Committee & (B) Alleged Breach Of UN Charter, Chapter VII – Alien Hostile Military Occupancy By Crown Canada In Absence Of Specific UNSC Warrant; (B) Through The UNSC, GTIF Counsel Will Petition The ICC – International Criminal Court Against Crown Canada; And, (C) ICJ International Court Of Justice.

Three Ancillary Tribunals Are Also Targeted : (A) IACHR : Inter-American Commission On Human Rights; (B) ICCAT : International Chamber Of Commerce Arbitration Tribunal; And, (C) The EUHRC - European Union Human Rights Court.

Additionally, The WTO : World Trade Organization Is Considered To Be A Viable Challenge Option; With $100-Million Legal Pursuits Being Budgeted.